May 30, 2024


General Evolution

Approaching perfection – E-Learning Provocateur


I have hardly ever comprehended the rationale of the 80% go mark.

Which 20% of our function are we geared up to do wrongly?

It may possibly clarify the universally weak condition of CX that providers are evidently ready to wear, but it’s arguably a lot more major when we look at the acronym-laden topics that are usually rolled out by means of e-learning, this sort of as OHS and CTF. Which 20% of security are we keen to threat? Which 20% of terrorism are we prepared to fund?

There has to be a greater way.

I’ve beforehand contended that an evaluation initially philosophy renders the idea of a go mark out of date, but went on to point out that this sort of a radical concept is a tale for yet another working day. Perfectly my pals, that day has arrived.

An arrow pointing from Diagnose to Remediate then back to Diagnose.

Recursive responses

Again in 2016, the College of Illinois’ fantastic mooc e-Finding out Ecologies: Ground breaking Approaches to Teaching and Finding out for the Digital Age piqued my fascination in the affordance of “recursive feedback” – described by the teacher as fast and repeatable cycles of responses or formative evaluation, built to frequently diagnose and remediate awareness gaps.

I propose we adopt a similar solution in the corporate sector. Drop the arbitrary go mark, even though nonetheless recording the rating and completion status in the LMS. But really don’t halt there. Observe it up with cycles of qualified intervention to shut the gaps, coupled with re-assessment to refresh the employee’s ability profile.

Relying on the domain, our persons may well never ever get to a rating of 100%. Or if they do, they may well not sustain it above time. After all, we’re human.

Nonetheless the recursive approach isn’t about obtaining perfection. It is about ongoing enhancement approaching perfection.

One arrow with a single red dot; another arrow with a wavy green line.

Way of functioning

While the mooc instructor’s idea of recursive suggestions aligns to formative assessment, my proposal aligns it to summative assessment. And that’s Ok. His major aim is on finding out. Mine is on overall performance. We occupy two sides of the exact coin.

To force the contrarianism even additional, I’m also comfortable with the big-scale distribution of an e-learning module. Even so, where these kinds of an approach has notoriously been taken care of as a tick & flick, I take into account it a period in a for a longer time term approach.

Write-up-remediation attempts, I see no perception in retaking the e-understanding module. Somewhat, a micro-evaluation technique encourages operational performance – not to mention worker sanity – with no sacrificing pedagogical success.

In this way, recursive comments gets to be a way of performing.

And the L&D department’s “big bang” initiatives can be saved for the wants that demand them.


Resource website link